CASE SUMMARIES : Practice

Monday 19 December 1994 00:02 GMT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The following notes of judgments were prepared by the reporters of the All England Law Reports.

Practice

R v Burley (Donald); CA (Cr Div) (Lord Taylor CJ, French, Longmore JJ); 7 Nov 1994.

The rulings governing the filing of documents relating to appeals were not there for perverse reasons but to enable the Court of Appeal to manage its business in a proper manner. Time limits must be obeyed unless there was some very good, exceptional reason not to.

Dafydd Enoch (Yanakas Achillea & Co, Holloway) for the applicant.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Thank you for registering

CASE SUMMARIES : Practice

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering